<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Almost a Great Software Test Organization</title> <atom:link href="http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=almost-a-great-test-organization</link> <description>Getting to On-Time Software Projects</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: The Busiest Software Test Organization Was Also The Best &#124; Project Management Tools That Work</title><link>http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link> <dc:creator>The Busiest Software Test Organization Was Also The Best &#124; Project Management Tools That Work</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:37:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/?p=481#comment-103</guid> <description>[...] an Almost A Great Software Test Organization, and the Best and Worst Test Organizations.    Thank you for bookmarking and sharing these articles [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an Almost A Great Software Test Organization, and the Best and Worst Test Organizations.    Thank you for bookmarking and sharing these articles [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce Benson</title><link>http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link> <dc:creator>Bruce Benson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:30:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/?p=481#comment-102</guid> <description>This test team was actually very good and had some very good people.In one case, one tester went to one of my managers and asked &quot;permission&quot; to enter a minor defect.  The reason given was that every tester was expected to submit defects.  Not finding and submitting a defect was considered not doing their job.  Normally he would not have considered the issue a true defected but he needed to submit something.  My manger told him it was OK with her and that she understood why he was doing it.  He was much relieved and entered the defect.  Most of the testers realized that the Test Director&#039;s policy was a bit extreme.They did a good job at whatever they were asked.   In this case, the metrics, it was the Test Director that probably didn&#039;t fully understand the significance of the information being reported.ThanksBruce</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This test team was actually very good and had some very good people.</p><p>In one case, one tester went to one of my managers and asked &#8220;permission&#8221; to enter a minor defect.  The reason given was that every tester was expected to submit defects.  Not finding and submitting a defect was considered not doing their job.  Normally he would not have considered the issue a true defected but he needed to submit something.  My manger told him it was OK with her and that she understood why he was doing it.  He was much relieved and entered the defect.  Most of the testers realized that the Test Director&#8217;s policy was a bit extreme.</p><p>They did a good job at whatever they were asked.   In this case, the metrics, it was the Test Director that probably didn&#8217;t fully understand the significance of the information being reported.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Bruce</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Project tracking team</title><link>http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link> <dc:creator>Project tracking team</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/?p=481#comment-101</guid> <description>The test organization, probably without fully understanding them, had done a good job at reporting them on a regular basis. This is really great.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The test organization, probably without fully understanding them, had done a good job at reporting them on a regular basis. This is really great.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Want To Stress Your Project Test Team? Give Them Good Quality! &#124; Project Management Tools That Work</title><link>http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/almost-a-great-test-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link> <dc:creator>Want To Stress Your Project Test Team? Give Them Good Quality! &#124; Project Management Tools That Work</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:14:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://pmtoolsthatwork.com/?p=481#comment-99</guid> <description>[...] which would suggest your improvement in quality might not be as significant as you believe.  Next, Almost a Great Test Organization.   Thank you for bookmarking and sharing these articles as this tells me which ones are the most [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which would suggest your improvement in quality might not be as significant as you believe.  Next, Almost a Great Test Organization.   Thank you for bookmarking and sharing these articles as this tells me which ones are the most [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/19 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk

Served from: pmtoolsthatwork.com @ 2010-09-09 23:39:23 -->