Home » Planning » Project Managers Beware of Oversimplifying Your Problems

“I’m always on the lookout for ideas concerning software estimation,even as I ponder my own eternal mantra: ‘Estimates are always wrong.’ … [A]gile methods avoid the extremes of compression and relaxation.  Relaxation is avoided by breaking traditional slow-to-deliver projects into small agile pieces, each easily delivered within the related market windows.  Working with these pieces also serves to avoid compression, since the same number of people can deliver the smaller agile pieces more quickly.”   Geoffrey Lowney, letters to the editor, Communications of the ACM, August 2011.

Geoffry’s comment to an article in the CACM caught my attention as it matches well with the comments I’ve heard in organizations that are struggling to deliver projects on time.  The first notion is that estimates are just that, estimates and hence are by definition wrong. The second is that there is some method “X” — usually several Xs being hotly debated — that if we use it, it will solve our problems.

There is nothing inherently wrong with either of these notions.  Both have a basis in reality because for many organizations the first notion of estimates always being wrong is a daily reality. The second notion that there is some method “X” that will help us is confirmed by these same organizations finally being able to deliver projects on time with good quality.

Project Managers Beware of Oversimplifying Your ProblemsWhere I’ve seen things go wrong is where these oversimplified notions become entrenched in the organization.  We no longer really try to do a good estimate or improve upon it, because they will “always be wrong” anyway.  We just “run the numbers” produce the estimate, react to the push back that it must be faster than that, and then settle upon an estimate that is organizationally acceptable.  “Smart” project managers first figure out what an acceptable schedule would be and then adjust their inputs to the estimation process so that it comes out as expected.  Breaking this “bad  estimation” culture with a techniques such as “brutal honesty” is a key step we’ve used to finally get estimates to be realistic and accurate (i.e., we deliver when we say we will deliver).

The second notion of a methodology “X” being our saving solution is illustrated by Geoffrey’s description of how Agile avoids compression and relaxation.  Because we use small pieces we can “easily” deliver in the market window, he says.  The hitch here, as we’ve seen this before, is the hint is that “small” means things suddenly work out.  As seductive as this sounds, and that is the key — it sounds so reasonable and intuitively obvious — it rarely works this easily.  I recall similar arguments that incremental development would fix waterfall projects (another “make it small and it will now suddenly work” approach). In one organization the inspired solution was to have the programmers do all the testing that the independent test team was doing.  If the programmers had to do it, it was argued, they would find all the errors the test teams found and hence their code would no longer ever have these errors (it didn’t work out that way).   The most humorous example was an early course I reviewed on setting up web sites.  The course material said that if an organization were to just set up an internal web site, then just about all company communications problems would … go away.

Estimates don’t have to always be wrong and solutions to our problems are not always the latest methodology fad.  Fully understanding and applying both a brutally honest estimating technique and a disciplined and practiced project management methodology will ensure our projects are successful.  Just beware of oversimplifying, the problems to be fixed and their solutions, as sometimes the oversimplification becomes part of the problem.

What real problems are oversimplified in your project or organization?

Thank you for sharing. Sharing and comments tells me which articles are most helpful to my readers:
Facebook facebook   Twitter twitter   Linkedin linkedin   Tumblr tumblr   Pinterest pinterest   Stumbleupon stumbleupon   Reddit reddit   Email email  

2 thoughts on “Project Managers Beware of Oversimplifying Your Problems

  1. UNLEASHPM says:

    Hi,
    The above description is very nice. we have also discuss about this.unleashpm deals with software tools like Agile project management tool, scrum tool, project management tool and many other tools
    http://www.unleashpm.com

    Thanks & Regards
    http://www.unleashpm.com

  2. Bruce Benson says:

    Comments from around the web:

    Gerri Horrington, MA, MBA, CLNP • I definitely agree…part of the challenge is the initial hours that you receive to implement projects…you find that many of the analyst and architects may not have considered all the aspects of the implementation (e.g. # of resources involved).

    Bruce Benson • Gerri, Estimating is a tough job by everyone. I find that just tracking how well an individual or department estimates (are they consistently high, low, what is their typical average estimate) is very useful. I’ve even told teams to come back with better estimates, longer schedules(!), because I knew their track record and they regularly underestimated. They were surprised that I, as the project manager, was telling them to make it longer — rather than shorter — which is what they generally hear from management. This “surprise” also helps to reinforce the notion that we want accurate estimates and I get back a better estimate (based upon past history) and often a renewed focus by the team on getting estimates right.

    Note, I don’t use my own estimate of their tasks, even if I know mine are more accurate, because I want them to continue getting better and I want them committed to something they proposed.

    Thanks!

    Bruce

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Website